Compare · 2026-10-14

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.2

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

CategoryGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2
General LLM
#14 · #14 in General LLM
Margin 9.523809523809518
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#74 · #74 in General LLM
Margin 50.34013605442177
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#16 · #16 in Reasoning
Margin 11.643835616438352
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#70 · #70 in Reasoning
Margin 48.63013698630137
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#14 · #14 in Math
Margin 28.888888888888886
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025
Science
#5 · #5 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 13, 2026
#26 · #26 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025
Coding
#20 · #20 in Coding
Margin 100
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025
Coding › Agentic
#20 · #20 in Coding › Agentic
Margin 100
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
—
Coding › Web dev
#25 · #25 in Coding › Web dev
Margin 22.429906542056074
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#67 · #67 in Coding › Web dev
Margin 61.6822429906542
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Long context
#14 · #14 in Long context
Margin 9.523809523809518
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#80 · #80 in Long context
Margin 54.42176870748299
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision
#14 · #14 in Vision
Margin 39.473684210526315
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 13, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026
Factuality
#15 · Was SOTA · Factuality
Margin 11.940298507462686
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#65 · #65 in Factuality
Margin 49.25373134328358
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)
#6 · #6 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 13, 2026
#24 · #24 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025
Price per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash: $1.5 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-5.2: $4.8125 per 1M blended tokens.

Open weights

Gemini 3.7 Flash: closed weights.

GPT-5.2: closed weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in General LLM at #14 against #74.

Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Reasoning at #16 against #70.

Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Science at #5 against #26.

Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Coding › Web dev at #25 against #67.

Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Long context at #14 against #80.

Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Factuality at #15 against #65.

Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Abstraction (ARC) at #6 against #24.

Gemini 3.7 Flash · GPT-5.2

Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.2?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.2 for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in General LLM at #14 against #74.

Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.2 for Reasoning?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Reasoning at #16 against #70.

Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.2 for Science?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.2 in Science at #5 against #26.